NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 889 MHz versus 753 MHz
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 144
- Environ 74% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 441.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 6% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 650 versus 560
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3749 versus 2544
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.572 versus 5.332
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.808 versus 0.635
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.943 versus 10.932
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 22.728
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1524 versus 800
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2519 versus 2418
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 versus 800
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 versus 2418
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz versus 753 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 144 |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 650 versus 560 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3749 versus 2544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 versus 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 versus 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 versus 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 versus 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 versus 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 versus 2418 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 170 versus 129
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 205.545 versus 151.304
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 versus 1426
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 1426
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 170 versus 129 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 205.545 versus 151.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 versus 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 1426 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 650 | 560 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | 170 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3749 | 2544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.572 | 5.332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 151.304 | 205.545 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.808 | 0.635 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.943 | 10.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 | 22.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1524 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1426 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2519 | 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 | 800 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 | 2418 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK208 | GF116 |
Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1460 | 1462 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz | 753 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 441.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 9.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Compte de transistor | 1,170 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
HDCP | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 |