NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 10.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1202 versus 111
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1913 versus 918
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1913 versus 918
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 1 August 2010 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1202 versus 111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 versus 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 versus 918 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1202 | 111 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 | 239 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3802 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 | 918 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 | 918 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | RV6xx |
Nom de code | GK107 | |
Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 1 August 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1188 | 1189 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Performance á point flottant | 652.8 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | yes |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |