NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
  • Environ 41% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 32 Watt versus 45 Watt
  • 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
  • Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 3299
  • Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3341 versus 1913
  • Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 3299
  • Environ 75% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3341 versus 1913
Caractéristiques
Date de sortie 1 October 2012 versus 22 March 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt versus 45 Watt
Taille de mémore maximale 2 GB versus 1 GB
Référence
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3670 versus 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3341 versus 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3670 versus 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3341 versus 1913

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

  • Environ 20% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 652.8 gflops versus 544.5 gflops
  • Environ 28% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 versus 935
  • Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 versus 160
  • Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3799 versus 2673
  • Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 versus 8.493
  • Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 340.824 versus 285.42
  • Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 versus 0.863
  • Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.773 versus 17.242
  • Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.111 versus 19.116
  • Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 versus 1913
  • Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 versus 1913
Caractéristiques
Performance á point flottant 652.8 gflops versus 544.5 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 1201 versus 935
PassMark - G2D Mark 235 versus 160
Geekbench - OpenCL 3799 versus 2673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 9.947 versus 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 340.824 versus 285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.982 versus 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 18.773 versus 17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.111 versus 19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2283 versus 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2283 versus 1913

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
935
1201
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
160
235
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2673
3799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.493
9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
285.42
340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.863
0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
17.242
18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.116
23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1913
2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3670
3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3341
1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1913
2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3670
3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3341
1913
Nom NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
PassMark - G3D Mark 935 1201
PassMark - G2D Mark 160 235
Geekbench - OpenCL 2673 3799
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.493 9.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 285.42 340.824
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.863 0.982
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.242 18.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.116 23.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1913 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3670 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3341 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1913 2283
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3670 3299
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3341 1913
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 414

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M

Essentiel

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Nom de code GK107 GK107
Date de sortie 1 October 2012 22 March 2012
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1213 1214
Genre Laptop Laptop

Infos techniques

Noyaux CUDA 384 384
Performance á point flottant 544.5 gflops 652.8 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Taux de remplissage de la texture 22.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt 45 Watt
Compte de transistor 1,270 million 1,270 million
Vitesse augmenté 950 MHz

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale Up to 2048x1536 Up to 2048x1536

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Soutien de bus PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Taille du laptop medium sized medium sized

Soutien API

DirectX 12 API 12 API
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Mémoire

RAM maximale 2 GB 1 GB
Largeur du bus mémoire 128bit 128bit
Vitesse de mémoire 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Genre de mémoire DDR3\GDDR5 DDR3\GDDR5
Mémoire partagé 0 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus