NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M versus ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1201 versus 1085
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 235 versus 219
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 9.947 versus 8.17
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.982 versus 0.86
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 versus 2070
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 versus 1679
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 versus 2070
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 versus 1679
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 versus 7 January 2010 |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 versus 1085 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 versus 219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 versus 8.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 versus 0.86 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 versus 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 versus 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 versus 1679 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 800 versus 384
- Environ 72% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,120.0 gflops versus 652.8 gflops
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 585.971 versus 340.824
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.108 versus 18.773
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 98.606 versus 23.111
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3077 versus 1913
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3077 versus 1913
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 800 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,120.0 gflops versus 652.8 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 585.971 versus 340.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.108 versus 18.773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 98.606 versus 23.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3077 versus 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3077 versus 1913 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1201 | 1085 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | 219 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3799 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | 8.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | 585.971 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | 0.86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | 20.108 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | 98.606 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 | 3077 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 | 2070 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 | 1679 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 | 3077 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Broadway |
| Date de sortie | 22 March 2012 | 7 January 2010 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1214 | 1216 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 652.8 gflops | 1,120.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3\GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.0 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| HDMI 1.3a | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 4600
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5870
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4250 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 625M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K2000
