AMD Radeon R6 M255DX versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R6 M255DX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
- 4.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 versus 3805
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 versus 1913
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 versus 1913
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 versus 3805 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 versus 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 versus 1913 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 950 MHz versus 855 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2283 versus 1055
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2283 versus 1055
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3299 versus 1927
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3299 versus 1927
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 239 versus 116
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1205 versus 605
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 versus 1927 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 239 versus 116 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1205 versus 605 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 | 3805 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1055 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1055 | 2283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 3299 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 | 1913 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | 239 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 1205 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Jet | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1201 | 1204 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 652.8 gflops | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R6 M255DX avec des autres
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDRadeon R9 M265X
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDFirePro W2100
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
