NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 20.64 versus 19.139
- 19.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 977 versus 51
- 31.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 47
- 30.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1833 versus 59.6
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 versus 19.139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 versus 51 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 versus 59.6 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1085 MHz versus 954 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 833.3 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 5000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.243 versus 6.705
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 versus 100.391
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.966 versus 0.441
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.793 versus 8.146
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 versus 977
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 versus 1494
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1085 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 833.3 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.243 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 versus 8.146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 1833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 628 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 211 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 10.243 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 393.811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 18.793 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 19.139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 3011 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 2916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 3335 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 51 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 47 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 59.6 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK208B | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1489 |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 833.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 5000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |