NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 96% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.75 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 48
- Environ 97% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 306.0 gflops versus 155.52 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 29 Watt
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 617 versus 317
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 199 versus 136
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2300 versus 1274
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.418 versus 2.597
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 142.734 versus 76.214
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.395 versus 0.239
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.158 versus 5.862
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 17.317 versus 4.574
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 895 versus 545
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 895 versus 545
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2014 versus 13 April 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s versus 6.5 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 192 versus 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops versus 155.52 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 29 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 617 versus 317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 versus 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2300 versus 1274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 versus 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 versus 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 versus 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 versus 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 versus 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 versus 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 versus 545 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 797 MHz
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 903 versus 280
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1455 versus 519
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 903 versus 280
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1455 versus 519
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 903 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1455 versus 519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 903 versus 280 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1455 versus 519 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 617 | 317 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 199 | 136 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2300 | 1274 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.418 | 2.597 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 142.734 | 76.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.395 | 0.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.158 | 5.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.317 | 4.574 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 895 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 280 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 519 | 1455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 895 | 545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 280 | 903 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 519 | 1455 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK208B | GF119 |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2014 | 13 April 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $49 | $59 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1594 | 1597 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $59.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.44 | 7.58 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 797 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | 48 |
Performance á point flottant | 306.0 gflops | 155.52 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | 102 °C |
Pipelines | 192 | 48 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.75 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | 29 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 292 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | Internal |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional) |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | 2.7" (6.9 cm) |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB or 1 GB | 1 GB (DDR3) |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5) | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 900 MHz | 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA |