NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus AMD Radeon HD 6670
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and AMD Radeon HD 6670 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 66 Watt
- Environ 52% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 724
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 247
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 versus 1905
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 4.861
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 versus 0.463
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1564
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1564
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 19 April 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 66 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 versus 1905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 versus 0.463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1564 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Environ 33% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 19.2 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 11% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 768.0 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.463 versus 166.832
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.918 versus 12.415
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 38.551 versus 36.916
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3260 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3348 versus 3324
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3260 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3348 versus 3324
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 versus 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 versus 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 versus 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 versus 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 versus 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 versus 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 versus 3324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 247 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 1905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3348 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GF108 | Turks |
| Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 19 April 2011 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1255 |
| Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $102.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 13.12 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 768.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 66 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 716 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 168 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 64 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||