NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 14.43 GTexel / s versus 13.0 billion / sec
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 692.7 gflops versus 311.04 gflops
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 65 Watt
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 versus 774
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 versus 237
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 versus 2626
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 versus 6.139
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 versus 0.65
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.415 versus 9.729
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 versus 19.871
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 versus 1208
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 3275
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 versus 1208
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 3275
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 1 February 2011 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s versus 13.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops versus 311.04 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 65 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 versus 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 versus 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 versus 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 versus 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 versus 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 versus 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 versus 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 versus 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 3275 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- 2.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.053 versus 166.832
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2053 versus 1693
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2053 versus 1693
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.053 versus 166.832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2053 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2053 versus 1693 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 237 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 2626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 6.139 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 171.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.65 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 9.729 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 19.871 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 2053 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3275 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 1 February 2011 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $79 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 1342 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $69.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 14.03 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 311.04 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 13.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 65 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, HDMIVGADual Link DVI |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5) |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire config standard par GPU | 1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA |