NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 55 Watt
- 320x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 versus 18 February 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 55 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 5.0 GB/s |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1020 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 60% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,111 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3337 versus 830
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 515 versus 253
- 3.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9306 versus 2902
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.239 versus 10.872
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 639.427 versus 166.832
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.341 versus 0.817
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32 versus 12.415
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 69.814 versus 36.916
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4498 versus 1951
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3324
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4498 versus 1951
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 versus 1693
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3324
- 3.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1050 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1020 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,111 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9306 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.239 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 639.427 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.341 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.814 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4498 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4498 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1050 versus 327 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 | 3337 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 | 9306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 34.239 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 639.427 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 2.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 69.814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 4498 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 | 1050 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
Nom de code | GF108 | GM107 |
Date de sortie | 18 June 2014 | 18 February 2014 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | $119 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1311 | 724 |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | $150.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | 27.54 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 700 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | 1,111 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.43 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 55 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 585 million | 1,870 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1085 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 512 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 80 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 5.0 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |