NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 837 MHz
- Environ 19% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 26.78 GTexel / s
- Environ 19% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 762.6 gflops versus 642.8 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 versus 1096
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 343 versus 180
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4312 versus 3439
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.994 versus 10.489
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 291.627 versus 202.905
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.023 versus 0.66
- Environ 85% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.139 versus 8.184
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 23.651 versus 19.323
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 837 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 26.78 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops versus 642.8 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 versus 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 versus 180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4312 versus 3439 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 versus 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 versus 202.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 versus 0.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 versus 8.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 versus 19.323 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Environ 42% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 versus 1790
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 versus 1427
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 versus 2153
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 versus 1790
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 versus 1427
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 versus 2153
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 2153 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 versus 1790 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 versus 1427 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 2153 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 | 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 180 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4312 | 3439 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.994 | 10.489 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 291.627 | 202.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.023 | 0.66 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.139 | 8.184 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.651 | 19.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1790 | 2255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1427 | 3133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2153 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1790 | 2255 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1427 | 3133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2153 | 3352 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
Date de sortie | 29 May 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1283 | 1286 |
Prix maintenant | $94.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.87 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | 837 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 762.6 gflops | 642.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 26.78 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 64 Watt | 45 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |