NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M versus AMD Radeon HD 8750M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and AMD Radeon HD 8750M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 837 MHz versus 620 MHz
- Environ 44% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 26.78 GTexel / s versus 18.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 642.8 gflops versus 595.2 gflops
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1092 versus 988
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.489 versus 8.274
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 versus 1734
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 versus 2221
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 versus 1734
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 versus 2221
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 26 February 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz versus 620 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.78 GTexel / s versus 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 642.8 gflops versus 595.2 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 versus 988 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 versus 8.274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 versus 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 versus 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 versus 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 versus 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 8750M
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 versus 176
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6044 versus 3356
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 271.177 versus 202.905
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.505 versus 0.66
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.834 versus 8.184
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 70.596 versus 19.323
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 versus 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6044 versus 3356 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 271.177 versus 202.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.505 versus 0.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.834 versus 8.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.596 versus 19.323 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8750M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | AMD Radeon HD 8750M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1092 | 988 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 176 | 203 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3356 | 6044 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | 8.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | 271.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | 1.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | 24.834 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | 70.596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 | 1734 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 | 2221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3351 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | AMD Radeon HD 8750M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Mars |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 26 February 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1279 | 1280 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 837 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 642.8 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 26.78 GTexel / s | 18.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 6 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7640G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7400G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8750M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820A
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
