NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 61% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 575 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 29.63 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 61% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 711.2 gflops versus 441.6 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5016 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 versus 8.572
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 versus 151.304
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 versus 0.808
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 versus 13.943
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 1524
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 1426
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 2519
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 versus 1 April 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 575 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s versus 9.2 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops versus 441.6 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 versus 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 versus 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 versus 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 versus 13.943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 2519 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
- Environ 52% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 39.301 versus 22.557
- 36.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1524 versus 42
- 25.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1426 versus 55
- 34.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2519 versus 72.2
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 39.301 versus 22.557 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1524 versus 42 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1426 versus 55 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2519 versus 72.2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 | 8.572 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 | 151.304 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 | 0.808 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 | 13.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 | 39.301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 | 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 | 2519 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 42 | 1524 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 55 | 1426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 72.2 | 2519 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 650 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3749 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK107 | GK208 |
Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1459 | 1460 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 575 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s | 9.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | |
Vitesse augmenté | 889 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.26 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |