NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition versus NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 706 MHz
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.63 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s
- Environ 31% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 711.2 gflops versus 542.2 gflops
- Environ 79% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5016 MHz versus 2800 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 versus 8.649
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 versus 174.555
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 versus 0.642
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 versus 11.732
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.557 versus 16.3
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 1892
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 861
- 2.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 1443
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 706 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s versus 22.59 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops versus 542.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz versus 2800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 versus 8.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 versus 174.555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 versus 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 versus 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 versus 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 1443 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 45x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 versus 42
- 15.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 861 versus 55
- 20x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1443 versus 72.2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 versus 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 versus 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 versus 72.2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 | 8.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 | 174.555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 | 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 | 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 | 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 | 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 42 | 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 55 | 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 72.2 | 1443 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1088 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3074 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1446 | 1447 |
| Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
| Prix maintenant | $79 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s | 22.59 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.26 GB / s | 44.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8300
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820M
