NVIDIA GeForce 820M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 versus 22.557
- 28.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 versus 42
- 26.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 versus 55
- 46.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 72.2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 versus 22.557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 versus 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 versus 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 72.2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 926 MHz versus 810 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 29.63 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 711.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5016 MHz versus 1802 MHz
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 versus 7.765
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 versus 161.305
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 versus 0.686
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 versus 14.257
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 1195
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 1447
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 3349
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz versus 810 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz versus 1802 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 versus 7.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 versus 161.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 versus 0.686 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 versus 14.257 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 1195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 1447 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 3349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 492 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2787 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | 10.451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 370.814 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 1.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 20.902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 22.557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 2483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 3406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 4045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 72.2 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1461 | 1464 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 711.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10 GTexel / s | 29.63 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 80.26 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 5016 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 820M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
ATIMobility FireGL 7800
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9700M GTS
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K420
NVIDIAGeForce 820M vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
