NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) versus AMD FirePro M5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD FirePro M5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 87% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 93% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 775 MHz
- Environ 93% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.72 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s
- Environ 93% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,911 gflops versus 992.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 56% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 4500 MHz
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 versus 2103
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17485 versus 6773
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 22.202
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 versus 537.558
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 2.245
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 108.052
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 2926
- 2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 2926
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 16 October 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 775 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s versus 31 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops versus 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 4500 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 versus 2103 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17485 versus 6773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 22.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 versus 537.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 2.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 108.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5100
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 292
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.642 versus 30.523
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 292 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 versus 30.523 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD FirePro M5100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 2103 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 800 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17485 | 6773 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 22.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 537.558 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 2.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 40.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 108.052 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | 2926 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD FirePro M5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Venus |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 16 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 644 | 647 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,500 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro M5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 550X
