NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) versus AMD FirePro W5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD FirePro W5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 46% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1354 MHz versus 930 MHz
- Environ 34% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.72 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- Environ 34% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,911 gflops versus 1,428 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 6000 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 versus 2989
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17485 versus 11644
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 35.15
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 3.199
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 163.258
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 4397
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 versus 3688
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 4397
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 versus 3688
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 31 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz versus 930 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops versus 1,428 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 6000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 versus 2989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17485 versus 11644 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 versus 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 537 versus 292
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 838.518 versus 799.414
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 versus 30.523
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 537 versus 292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 838.518 versus 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 versus 30.523 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD FirePro W5100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 2989 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 537 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17485 | 11644 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 35.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 838.518 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 3.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 57.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 163.258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | 4397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP106B | Bonaire |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 31 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 644 | 646 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz | 930 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
Longeur | 171 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |