NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) versus AMD Radeon R7 360
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 360 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 49% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 59.72 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 18% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,911 gflops versus 1,613 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 6.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 versus 3106
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17472 versus 16433
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 38.068
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 3.386
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 188.858
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 versus 4799
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 versus 4799
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2089 versus 1402
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 18 June 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s versus 50.4 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops versus 1,613 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 versus 3106 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17472 versus 16433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 versus 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 versus 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 versus 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 versus 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 versus 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 versus 1402 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 360
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 514 versus 292
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 819.203 versus 799.414
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.285 versus 30.523
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4147 versus 3721
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4147 versus 3721
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 514 versus 292 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 819.203 versus 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.285 versus 30.523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4147 versus 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4147 versus 3721 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 360
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 360 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 3106 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 514 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17472 | 16433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 38.068 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 819.203 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 3.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 58.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 188.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | 4799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 4147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2089 | 1402 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 360 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP106B | Tobago |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 18 June 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 643 | 645 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $146.65 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 29.24 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1354 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 1,911 gflops | 1,613 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 59.72 GTexel / s | 50.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,080 million |
Stream Processors | 768 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Longeur | 165 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 112 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |