NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB versus AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 730 MHz
- 2.2x plus de vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 780 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- 7.3x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 11.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 versus 896
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 versus 304
- 6.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 versus 5684
- 9.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 12.111
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 253.178
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 1.211
- 6.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 73.506
- 7.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 1645
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 2426
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 1677
- 7.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 1645
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 2426
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 1677
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 versus 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 versus 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 versus 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 1677 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 versus 21.766
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 versus 21.766 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 | 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 | 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | 1677 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GP106 | Oland |
Date de sortie | 19 July 2016 | 30 June 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 356 | 1199 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz | 780 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz | 730 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 250 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |