NVIDIA Titan X Pascal versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Titan X Pascal and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 342.9 GTexel / s versus 136.7 GTexel / s
- 2.8x plus de pipelines: 3584 versus 1280
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 10,974 gflops versus 4,375 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10008 MHz versus 8008 MHz
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68299 versus 35320
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 versus 119.148
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2368.267 versus 1373.562
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 versus 8.694
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 versus 454.799
- 2.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9646 versus 4208
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 342.9 GTexel / s versus 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 10,974 gflops versus 4,375 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz versus 8008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68299 versus 35320 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 versus 119.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 versus 1373.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 versus 8.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 versus 454.799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 versus 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 versus 3691 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9646 versus 4208 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1417 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.766 versus 21.354
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 10841
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 10841
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1417 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 versus 21.354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3333 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68299 | 35320 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | 119.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | 1373.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | 8.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | 21.766 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | 454.799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9646 | 4208 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10075 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP102 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 2 August 2016 | 19 July 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | $299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 345 | 346 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1531 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1417 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 10,974 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 342.9 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 250 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 480.4 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Titan X Pascal avec des autres
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
NVIDIATitan X Pascal vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
