NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) versus AMD FirePro W5100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) and AMD FirePro W5100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 930 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 283.4 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 768
- 6.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 9,068 gflops versus 1,428 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 4.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55548 versus 11724
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.103 versus 35.15
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 838.518
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 3.199
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 163.258
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 4397
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3688
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3356
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 4397
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3688
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3356
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 versus 31 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 930 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s versus 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 768 |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops versus 1,428 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 versus 11724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 versus 35.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 838.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 3.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 163.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5100
- 3.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 50 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 600x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6000 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.354 versus 27.417
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 57.354 versus 27.417 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD FirePro W5100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55548 | 11724 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.103 | 35.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 | 838.518 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 | 3.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.417 | 57.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 | 163.258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 | 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 | 4397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 | 3688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7209 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2978 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 531 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | AMD FirePro W5100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP104 | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 15 August 2016 | 31 March 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 254 | 627 |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 283.4 GTexel / s | 44.64 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 2,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI | 4x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 4 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Sortie du composant vidéo HD | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Longeur | 171 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | 96 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | 6000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIATesla P100 SXM2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) vs
IntelArc Pro A50
