NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 6967
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 36107
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 105.688
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 1083.926
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 8.251
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 79.029
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 520.089
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3624
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3624
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 6967 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3346 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 626 versus 564
- 2.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 880 versus 305
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 626 versus 564 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 880 versus 305 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU107 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | $169 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 405 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Pixel fill rate | 39.81 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 159.23 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |