NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1485 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 28% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 4.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7881 versus 1633
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 versus 373
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 39165 versus 10258
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 134.765 versus 29.977
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1316.075 versus 309.874
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.799 versus 2.177
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.915 versus 35.847
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 573.418 versus 167.399
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10959 versus 2315
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3162
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3339
- 4.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10959 versus 2315
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3162
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3339
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 versus 26 October 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 versus 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 versus 373 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 versus 10258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 versus 29.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 versus 309.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 versus 2.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 versus 35.847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 versus 167.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 versus 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 versus 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3339 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | 1633 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | 373 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | 10258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | 29.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | 309.874 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | 2.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | 35.847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | 167.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | 2315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3162 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU107 | Raven |
| Date de sortie | 30 April 2019 | 26 October 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 376 | 912 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1485 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,664 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 640 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,940 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | |
| RAM maximale | 256 MB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 12.8 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 vs
NVIDIATesla K80
