NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro Duo pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 79% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 157.1 GTexel/s versus 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12777 versus 8164
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 versus 765
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 62617 versus 53806
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 versus 141.474
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 versus 13.132
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 versus 112.973
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 versus 799.933
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 versus 10141
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 versus 10141
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 26 April 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s versus 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12777 versus 8164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 versus 765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62617 versus 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 versus 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 versus 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 versus 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 versus 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 versus 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3713 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 5.8x plus de pipelines: 2x 4096 versus 1408
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 versus 2548.187
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 versus 3351
- 11.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 versus 3351
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2x 4096 versus 1408 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 versus 2548.187 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12777 | 8164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 765 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62617 | 53806 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 141.474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 3621.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 13.132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 112.973 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 799.933 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 38251 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 10141 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 38251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Capsaicin |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $1,499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 188 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Conception | reference | |
| Prix maintenant | $849 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2x 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 8,900 million |
| Unités de Compute | 128 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 277 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | DirectX® 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| Enduro | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGRID M10-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
