NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 69.6x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12776 vs 8137
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 745
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 62624 vs 53806
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 187.131 vs 141.474
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 15.882 vs 13.132
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 117.673 vs 112.973
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 901.388 vs 799.933
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17812 vs 10141
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17812 vs 10141
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 26 April 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 vs 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 vs 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 vs 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 vs 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 vs 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 vs 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 vs 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 vs 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3713 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo
- 5.8x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 1408
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3621.344 vs 2548.187
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3351
- 11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3351
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2x 4096 vs 1408 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3621.344 vs 2548.187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 38251 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 38251 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon Pro Duo |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12776 | 8137 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | 745 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62624 | 53806 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 141.474 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 3621.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 13.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 112.973 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 799.933 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 38251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 10141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 38251 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5978 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | AMD Radeon Pro Duo | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | TU116 | Capsaicin |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 | 26 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | $1,499 |
Place in performance rating | 207 | 188 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Design | reference | |
Price now | $849 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.05 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 2x 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 8,900 million |
Compute units | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 8,192 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | 277 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 3x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | DirectX® 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 512 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 2x 4096 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
Enduro | ||
FreeSync | ||
FRTC | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
ZeroCore |