NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 125 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 versus 746
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 versus 1242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 versus 7 January 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 versus 746 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 versus 1242 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 36% de pipelines plus haut: 1920 versus 1408
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 versus 12712
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 versus 62641
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 versus 187.131
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 versus 2548.187
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 versus 15.882
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 versus 117.673
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 versus 901.388
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 17812
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3717
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3351
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 17812
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3717
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3351
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 1920 versus 1408 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 versus 12712 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 versus 62641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 versus 187.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 versus 2548.187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 versus 15.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 versus 117.673 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 versus 901.388 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 17812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 17812 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 14119 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 746 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 71402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 3119.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 6714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 6714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 1242 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU116 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 29 Oct 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | $349 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 223 | 161 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1365 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 229 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 336.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs
AMDRyzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
