NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 12% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1530 MHz vs 1365 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1785 MHz vs 1680 MHz
- Etwa 28% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 125 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 804 vs 746
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1278 vs 1242
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 Oct 2019 vs 7 January 2019 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 1365 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz vs 1680 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 vs 746 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 vs 1242 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Etwa 36% höhere Leitungssysteme: 1920 vs 1408
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 12712
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 62641
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 187.131
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 2548.187
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 15.882
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 117.673
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 901.388
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 17812
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3717
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 3351
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 17812
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3717
- 2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 3351
Spezifikationen | |
Leitungssysteme | 1920 vs 1408 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14119 vs 12712 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71402 vs 62641 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 vs 187.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 vs 2548.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 vs 15.882 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 vs 117.673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 vs 901.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 vs 3351 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12712 | 14119 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 804 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 62641 | 71402 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | 217.04 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | 3119.736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | 21.707 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | 133.975 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17812 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17812 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 6714 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1278 | 1242 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU116 | TU106 |
Startdatum | 29 Oct 2019 | 7 January 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $229 | $349 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 223 | 161 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Jetzt kaufen | $349.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1408 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 125 Watt | 160 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6600 million | 10,800 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 2 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 9 inches (229 mm) | 229 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Breite | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 336.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | 192 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz |