NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 3.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1140 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1335 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 128.2 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 64x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 24
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 versus 1237
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 360 versus 299
- 11.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 versus 4657
- 7.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 versus 27.517
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 versus 354.254
- 8.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 versus 1.807
- 4.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 versus 20.323
- 16.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 versus 29.327
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3309
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3309
- 72.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 versus 1 September 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 24 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 versus 68 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 60 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 60 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8609 | 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 | 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 9.5 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 23 April 2019 | 1 September 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 315 | 1234 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1335 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1140 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 128.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.202 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.101 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 64.08 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.2 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 189 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9270
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 390
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs
IntelArc A380
