NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 3.3x more core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 4451.4x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 64x more pipelines: 1536 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 1237
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 360 vs 299
• 11.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 4657
• 7.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.93 vs 27.517
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1919.95 vs 354.254
• 8.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.6 vs 1.807
• 4.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.964 vs 20.323
• 16.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 492.867 vs 29.327
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
• 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3309
• 72.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 vs 68

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• 4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8609 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	360 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52263 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	195.93 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1919.95 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.6 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.964 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	492.867 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12301 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3718 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4903 68

Compare specifications (specs)