NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon RX 590
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon RX 590 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1469 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 46% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 175 Watt
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11689 versus 9464
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57152 versus 46557
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 versus 137.469
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 versus 12.352
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 versus 762.142
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 13383
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 13383
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5413 versus 4762
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 15 November 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1469 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 8000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11689 versus 9464 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 versus 46557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 versus 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 versus 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 versus 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 versus 4762 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 590
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 versus 782
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2083.862 versus 1892.505
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 139.477 versus 118.54
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 versus 782 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2083.862 versus 1892.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.477 versus 118.54 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 590
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon RX 590 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11689 | 9464 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 796 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | 46557 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 137.469 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 2083.862 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 12.352 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 139.477 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 762.142 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 13383 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 | 4762 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon RX 590 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Polaris 30 |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 15 November 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 241 | 260 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1469 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Performance á point flottant | 7.1 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 49.54 GP/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.48 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 8000 MHz |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |