NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon VII
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon VII pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1400 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1750 MHz
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 300 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 2000 MHz
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 versus 69.256
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 versus 499.927
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 11724
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 11724
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 7 February 2019 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1400 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1750 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 2000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 versus 69.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 versus 499.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 11724 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon VII
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16690 versus 11690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 786 versus 782
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 89411 versus 57152
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 206.353 versus 190.366
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 versus 1892.505
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.606 versus 13.492
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9294 versus 5413
| Caractéristiques | |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 12 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 versus 11690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 versus 782 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89411 versus 57152 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 206.353 versus 190.366 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 versus 1892.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.606 versus 13.492 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9294 versus 5413 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon VII
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon VII |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | 16690 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 786 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | 89411 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 206.353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 4659.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 21.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 69.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 499.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 11724 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 | 9294 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon VII | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Vega 20 |
| Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 7 February 2019 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $699 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 241 | 214 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
| Génération GCN | 5th Gen | |
| Prix maintenant | $699.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 13,230 million |
| Unités de Compute | 60 | |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.46 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.7 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.8 TFLOPs | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 115.26 GP/s | |
| Stream Processors | 3840 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 432.24 GT/s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | 3 |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 305 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 W | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 1024 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 4096 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6900X
