NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1733 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 120 Watt versus 180 Watt
- 800.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8004 MHz versus 10 GB/s
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 58014 versus 55548
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 189.842 versus 150.103
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 116.183 versus 27.417
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 875.838 versus 819.934
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 11173
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 27 May 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1733 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt versus 180 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz versus 10 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 versus 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 versus 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 versus 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 versus 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15578 versus 11659
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 887 versus 776
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2036.763 versus 1902.867
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.035 versus 13.408
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1560 versus 1065
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15578 versus 11659 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 887 versus 776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2036.763 versus 1902.867 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.035 versus 13.408 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1560 versus 1065 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11659 | 15578 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | 887 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 58014 | 55548 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 189.842 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1902.867 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.408 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.183 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 875.838 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3343 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 11173 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3343 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1065 | 1560 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU116 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 27 May 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | $599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 258 | 281 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1733 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 7,200 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | 10 GB/s |
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 320 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
