NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- 4x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 96
- 2.9x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 729.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 11.245 versus 4.233
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 301.554 versus 161.144
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.785 versus 0.519
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 16.08 versus 7.151
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1848 versus 1032
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2690 versus 1595
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5125 versus 2392
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 versus 23 August 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 versus 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 versus 161.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 versus 0.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 versus 7.151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 versus 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 versus 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 versus 2392 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
- 3.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 512 MB
- 33x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1032 versus 31.3
- 36.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1595 versus 43.4
- 26.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2392 versus 91.5
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.605 versus 16.56 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1032 versus 31.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1595 versus 43.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2392 versus 91.5 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.245 | 4.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 301.554 | 161.144 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.785 | 0.519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.08 | 7.151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.56 | 16.605 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1848 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2690 | 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5125 | 2392 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31.3 | 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 43.4 | 1595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 91.5 | 2392 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 436 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 126 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2108 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 April 2013 | 23 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1497 | 1498 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 950 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 729.6 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 30.4 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 715 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 96 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7900 GS
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 540M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 510
