NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and AMD Radeon HD 6770M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 1 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 67% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1840 versus 964
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.591 versus 4.817
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 versus 234.842
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.736 versus 0.393
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 versus 15.475
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 versus 33.71
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 versus 3044
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 versus 3044
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 4 January 2011 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 725 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1840 versus 964 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 versus 4.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 versus 234.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 versus 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 versus 15.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 versus 33.71 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3348 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6770M
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 versus 217
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 versus 6691
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 versus 217 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8338 versus 6691 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1840 | 964 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 572 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6691 | 8338 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 4.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 234.842 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 0.393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 15.475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 33.71 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3348 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | AMD Radeon HD 6770M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GP108 | Whistler |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 4 January 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1005 | 985 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 725 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 716 million |
Performance á point flottant | 696.0 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.6 GB / s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 |