NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus ATI FirePro V7800
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and ATI FirePro V7800 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 9 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 700 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 15x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 150 Watt
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6691 versus 4894
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.591 versus 15.084
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.736 versus 1.448
- 42.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 versus 63
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 26 April 2010 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6691 versus 4894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 versus 15.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 versus 1.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 versus 63 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI FirePro V7800
- 3.8x plus de pipelines: 1440 versus 384
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2028 versus 1840
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 versus 217
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1124.892 versus 445.82
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 39.448 versus 32.43
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 181.538 versus 102.234
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3721 versus 2680
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 1440 versus 384 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2028 versus 1840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 versus 217 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1124.892 versus 445.82 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.448 versus 32.43 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 181.538 versus 102.234 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3721 versus 2680 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: ATI FirePro V7800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | ATI FirePro V7800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1840 | 2028 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 217 | 307 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6691 | 4894 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 15.084 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 1124.892 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 1.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 39.448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 181.538 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 3721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 63 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | ATI FirePro V7800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
Nom de code | GP108 | Cypress |
Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 26 April 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1005 | 1008 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $759 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 1440 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 2,154 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,016.0 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 50.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 254 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB / s |