NVIDIA GeForce MX230 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX230
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1519 MHz versus 980 MHz
- Environ 53% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 14x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 10 Watt versus 140 Watt
- 1001.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 versus 62.69
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz versus 980 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt versus 140 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 versus 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 versus 3690 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 960 versus 384
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4017 versus 1830
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 487 versus 214
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11364 versus 6740
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.505 versus 21.591
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 versus 445.82
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 versus 1.736
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 versus 32.43
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 versus 2680
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 versus 2680
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 960 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4017 versus 1830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 versus 214 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11364 versus 6740 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 versus 21.591 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 versus 445.82 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 versus 1.736 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 versus 32.43 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 versus 2680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1830 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 214 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6740 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.591 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 445.82 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.736 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 32.43 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 102.234 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2680 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2680 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX230 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP108 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 21 February 2019 | 6 September 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 981 | 740 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1519 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,800 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,981 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 78.4 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX230 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2400 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 745 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon R8 M445DX
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P400
NVIDIAGeForce MX230 vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
