NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 26% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1168 MHz
- Environ 29% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1284 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 7000 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 versus 7657
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 versus 676
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 87635 versus 34598
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 versus 122.268
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 versus 1890.261
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 versus 10.121
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 versus 117.008
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 versus 625.621
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 9258
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3709
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3351
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 9258
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3709
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3351
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 15 October 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1284 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 7000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 versus 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 versus 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 versus 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 versus 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 versus 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 versus 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 versus 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 versus 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3351 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 175 Watt
- 424.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 849 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 175 Watt |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 | 7657 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 | 676 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 | 34598 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 | 122.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | 1890.261 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | 117.008 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | 625.621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 9258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 849 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU106 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 358 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1284 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1168 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 5,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |