NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16498 versus 16143
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 854 versus 821
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 versus 3742.063
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 160.92 versus 153.341
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5567 versus 3718
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5026 versus 3350
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5567 versus 3718
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5026 versus 3350
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16498 versus 16143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 854 versus 821 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 versus 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 versus 153.341 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 versus 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 6% de pipelines plus haut: 2304 versus 2176
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88053 versus 87590
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 versus 243.864
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 1269.445
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 20969
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 20969
- 788x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1576 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 2176 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88053 versus 87590 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 versus 243.864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 versus 27.021 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 1269.445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 20969 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 20969 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1576 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16498 | 16143 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 854 | 821 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 87590 | 88053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 243.864 | 251.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | 3742.063 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | 27.153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | 153.341 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | 1304.365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 22615 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 1576 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 149 | 152 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Pipelines | 2176 | 2304 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 175 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 229 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |