NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3652
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3290
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3652
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 14151
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 750
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137748 versus 70684
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 220.337
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 3131.344
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 21.852
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 135.923
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1141.283
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 20094
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 20094
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 14151 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 750 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 versus 70684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 220.337 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 3131.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 135.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1141.283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 20094 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 20094 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14151 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70684 | 137748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7488 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU106 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $9,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 150 | 103 |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIATITAN V
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon 760M
