NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 295 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 versus 14.889
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 versus 14744
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3358
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 versus 14744
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 7 August 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 295 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 versus 14.889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 versus 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Environ 41% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1247 MHz versus 885 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1546 MHz versus 1185 MHz
- 3.6x plus de pipelines: 8192 versus 2304
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14391 versus 11744
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 483
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 204168 versus 78205
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 195.478 versus 168.08
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2129.009 versus 1935.102
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 129.271 versus 111.023
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1328.033 versus 1001.496
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7520 versus 6839
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1247 MHz versus 885 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1546 MHz versus 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 8192 versus 2304 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14391 versus 11744 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 204168 versus 78205 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.478 versus 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2129.009 versus 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.271 versus 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1328.033 versus 1001.496 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7520 versus 6839 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11744 | 14391 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 800 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78205 | 204168 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 195.478 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 2129.009 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 14.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 129.271 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1328.033 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 14744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 | 7520 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 7 August 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 178 | 170 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 41.07 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1185 MHz | 1546 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 885 MHz | 1247 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 8192 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 295 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Unités de Compute | 64 | |
Performance á point flottant | 12.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 840 GFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.7 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.4 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 98.90 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 4096 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 395.80 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
Longeur | 279 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 2048 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |