NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 42% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1132 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1628 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1696 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 141.066
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 19663
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 19663
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1132 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1628 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1696 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 141.066 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- 2x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2560
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 versus 18253
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 versus 99847
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 562.775 versus 293.508
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1964.377 versus 1438.826
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 2560 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 versus 18253 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 versus 885 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 versus 99847 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 versus 293.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 versus 1438.826 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 20021 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 888 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | 160720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 562.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 141.066 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1964.377 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 19663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $8,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 94 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1628 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1132 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,817 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
