NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18222 versus 16235
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 879 versus 406
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 158.103 versus 73.167
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1253.829
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 16337
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 16337
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 21 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18222 versus 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 versus 406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 versus 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 16337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- 2x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 2560
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 177023 versus 99291
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 293.508
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 4045.784
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 29.145
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 2560 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 177023 versus 99291 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 4045.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 29.145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18222 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99291 | 177023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU104 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 21 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 142 | 143 |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 5120 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | None |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |