NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 versus NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 10008 MHz
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 88096 versus 67348
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 251.703 versus 165.792
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3742.063 versus 2368.267
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.153 versus 17.829
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 153.341 versus 21.354
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1304.365 versus 992.132
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 versus 10841
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3696
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 versus 3333
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 versus 10841
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3696
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 versus 3333
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 versus 2 August 2016 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 10008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 versus 67348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 versus 165.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 versus 2368.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 versus 17.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 versus 21.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 versus 992.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 versus 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 versus 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 versus 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Environ 56% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 2304
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2243 versus 1569
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1417 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2243 versus 1569 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16112 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 819 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88096 | 67348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 251.703 | 165.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3742.063 | 2368.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.153 | 17.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.341 | 21.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1304.365 | 992.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1569 | 2243 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 17 October 2018 | 2 August 2016 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $1,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 151 | 359 |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 10,974 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 342.9 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 480.4 GB / s | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
