NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 5% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 12000 MHz versus 11408 MHz
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 81953 versus 65520
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 versus 146.609
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 versus 16138
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 versus 3355
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 versus 16138
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 versus 3714
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 versus 3355
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 4 November 2017 |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz versus 11408 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 versus 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 versus 146.609 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 versus 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 versus 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 versus 3355 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
- Environ 91% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1405 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1095 MHz
- Environ 30% de pipelines plus haut: 3840 versus 2944
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3676.805
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 23.759 versus 22.75
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 162.692
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1116.69
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10139 versus 7990
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1405 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1095 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 2944 |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 versus 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 162.692 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1116.69 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10139 versus 7990 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13147 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 81953 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 146.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7990 | 10139 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104B | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 4 November 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 143 | 215 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1095 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | 3840 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6400
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
