NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1620 MHz
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 3072 versus 2304
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19606 versus 16174
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 824
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 117339 versus 87137
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 337.794 versus 252.062
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4566.815 versus 3729.447
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.631 versus 27.133
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 versus 154.621
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 versus 1303.435
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 22615
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 22615
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 versus 17 October 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1620 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 versus 2304 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19606 versus 16174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 versus 87137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 versus 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 versus 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 versus 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 versus 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 versus 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 3350 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 4435.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8871 versus 2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3716 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8871 versus 2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19606 | 16174 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 824 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 117339 | 87137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 | 252.062 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 | 3729.447 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 | 27.133 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 | 154.621 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 | 1303.435 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3350 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 | 8871 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU106 |
| Date de sortie | 23 July 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $499 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 109 | 140 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
| Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 229 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 496 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6800
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600S
