NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 570
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 52% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz
- Environ 38% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz
- Environ 59% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 159.23 GTexel/s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 2048
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 6967
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 626
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 36107
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 105.688
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1083.926
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 8.251
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 79.029
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 520.089
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3624
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 9172
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3624
- 3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 880
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 18 April 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 926-1168 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1206-1244 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 159.23 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 2048 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 880 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 570
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7000 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 880 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $169 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 405 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Conception | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix maintenant | $149.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 5,700 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 450 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |