NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 570
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und AMD Radeon RX 570 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 52% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz
- Etwa 38% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz
- Etwa 59% höhere Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s
- 2.4x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 2048
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 6967
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 626
- 3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 36107
- 3.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 105.688
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1083.926
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 8.251
- Etwa 91% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 79.029
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 520.089
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 9172
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3624
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 9172
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3624
- 3x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 880
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 18 April 2017 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 926-1168 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1206-1244 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 159.23 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 2048 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 880 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 570
- Etwa 33% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 570
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 6967 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 36107 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 105.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1083.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 8.251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 79.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 520.089 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 9172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3624 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3346 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 880 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 570 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | GA104 | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $169 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 405 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Jetzt kaufen | $149.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.00 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1206-1244 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 926-1168 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 39.81 GP/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 159.23 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 5,700 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 5.1 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture Units | 128 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 241 mm |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 450 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Überbrückungsfreies CrossFire | ||
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |