NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% de pipelines plus haut: 3584 versus 3072
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 47% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 170 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 versus 920
- 980.5x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1961 versus 2
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 23 July 2019 |
Pipelines | 3584 versus 3072 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 versus 920 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 versus 2 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1650 MHz versus 1320 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1777 MHz
- 7.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19514 versus 17107
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 115804 versus 88251
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 338.122 versus 299.369
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4571.03 versus 4021.382
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.6 versus 28.778
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.349 versus 188.944
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1653.08 versus 1152.664
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 versus 22495
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 versus 22495
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1650 MHz versus 1320 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1777 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19514 versus 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 115804 versus 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 338.122 versus 299.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4571.03 versus 4021.382 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.6 versus 28.778 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.349 versus 188.944 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1653.08 versus 1152.664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 versus 22495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 versus 22495 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 | 19514 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 920 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 | 115804 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | 338.122 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | 4571.03 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | 31.6 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | 190.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | 1653.08 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | 27179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1961 | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 23 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $329 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 134 | 110 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1777 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1320 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.30 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 199.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13250 million | |
Noyaux CUDA | 3072 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | 650 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 2-Slot |
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 360 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |