NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 1920
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 39% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 160 Watt
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 220.337
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3552.807 versus 3131.344
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.212 versus 21.852
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 135.923
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1422.602 versus 1141.283
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 20094
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 7442
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 6714
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 20094
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 7442
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 6714
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 7 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 1920 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 versus 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 versus 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 versus 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 6714 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 220.337 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 3131.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 21.852 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 135.923 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1141.283 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 6714 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14152 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70763 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7487 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU106 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 7 January 2019 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 93 | 150 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |