NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2944
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 326.494
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.723 versus 159.275
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 25500
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 9367 versus 6966
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8604 versus 6293
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 25500
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 9367 versus 6966
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8604 versus 6293
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 2944 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 versus 159.275 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 versus 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 versus 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 versus 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 versus 6293 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3938.377 versus 3552.807
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 31.212
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1422.602
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 versus 3552.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 31.212 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1422.602 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 6293 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18799 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 103974 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10935 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 97 | 100 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |